Friday, March 15, 2013

History of Character or Virtue Ethics and It’s Applications in Today’s Journalism


Character, or virtue ethics has been around the longest out of the four ethical systems.  The Greeks believed strongly in the notion of virtues such as courage, modesty, stoicism, honesty, etc.  According to virtue ethics, you are virtuous because of your character and your character influences your decisions.  In other words, if you act on the virtues mentioned above but it is not sincere, then you are not acting virtuous.  Although there is a list of virtues that people are advised to follow, we are not told exactly how to act.  For example, virtue ethics suggests that we should show honesty, but it does not tell us how to go about doing this.  It gives us a framework on how to live our lives, but it is ultimately up to us how to do so.  Although virtue ethics may seem old fashioned, it is extremely important in today’s society, seeing as journalism has only grown with our increases in technology and social media.  There are two ethics that are based on virtue ethics, which are the Golden Rule and the Golden Mean. 
 
The Golden Rule: “Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do To You”
The Golden Rule is a basic principle in Judeo-Christian belief, which is also a common believe in Western cultures.  It deals with treating others how you would like to be treated – with respect and dignity.  For example, the book says that if a journalist is interviewing a grieving relative, he/she should treat that person fairly.  That being said, the journalist may not want to ask any questions that are too painful for the parents to answer because that would not be respectful.  In addition, the journalist should express empathy towards the parents.  This is important so that the journalist is not charged on invasion of privacy or tastelessness. 
Journalist Covering a Rape Trial Omits Names
I found an article on foxnews.com which covers the story of an Ohio rape trial.  Two high school football players are currently being charged with raping a 16-year-old-girl after attending a party with alcohol last summer.  The girl was intoxicated and says she has no recollection of the night, so the judge will be basing his decision off of text messages, photographic and video images, and witnesses.  If you look at the article, you will notice that no names were given for the defendants or the victim.  I believe this is a good example of The Golden Rule because the journalist sees that the people involved in this case are young, and that releasing this information could be detrimental to them.  For the boys being accused, nothing has been proven thus far, so releasing their names would be disrespectful.  For the girl victim, she stated in an interview how embarrassed she was about the situation, so giving out her name would just make the situation worse.  I think that the journalist made a wise decision by leaving out the names of these individuals, at least until the trial is over.
 
The Golden Mean 
The Golden Mean was adopted in different forms by both Aristotle and Confucius, who explained the importance of finding a balance between two extremes.  In other words, there is a “middle way” that journalists should follow which means finding a balance and fairness among both sides to an issue or topic.  The book states that this does not necessarily mean giving the same coverage to a certain topic, but that the importance should be evaluated.  The book also says that this principle has to be taken into moderation.  For example, it wouldn’t be ethical to steal half of the money in a cash register just because it is the “middle way”, because stealing is wrong in the first place.  Artistotle says that we need to decide a mean because the mean decides how ethical acts will be judged. 
Journalist Shows No Political Side With Rob Portman’s Reversal On Gay Marriage
It is important that journalists keep a middle ground when reporting controversial political topics.  In a recent CNN article, it is explained that Ohio Senator Rob Portman has changed his views on gay marriage to support the issue.  Portman did tireless campaigning for Mitt Romney, so it is obvious that his new stance on gay marriage is shocking to many.  This article was featured on CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, etc and I noticed that none of the writers expressed their opinions on gay marriage.  They simply explained that Portman had a change of heart because of his gay son.  I think it's good that the journalists omitted their opinions on gay marriage because it could sway the reader’s opinion.  By finding a balance between the two conservative and liberal extremes, the reader is able to form his/her own opinions on the issue. 
The Importance of Character or Virtue Ethics
 
I selected the character or virtue ethics because I think that many people have forgotten how important it is.  For example, in terms of The Golden Rule, some journalists will do whatever it takes to get the best story.  This may mean asking inappropriate questions or releasing too much information to the public which can hurt individuals.  Likewise, in terms of The Golden Mean, there are so many times when certain political websites clearly choose a side, when really they should keep neutral.  I believe that out of all of the ethics outlined in the book, character or virtue ethics needs the most attention in today's world where anyone can post whatever they want on the internet. 

4 comments:

  1. Rachel, your post was very well-written and informative. You did a good job of effectively explaining what virtue ethics is, and I really liked the examples that you picked for both the Golden Rule and the Golden Mean. They were perfect for depicting how these rules can be applied in today's media. I agree with you that there needs to be more of a focus on Character/Virtue Ethics, because there have been so many stories of how neglecting virtuous behavior have landed media personae in "hot water." I would be curious to find out whether you think there's a branch of journalism that you think needs to be more virtuous--pop culture journalism? World news? There are many options to choose from, and I wonder if any of them are more or less virtuous than the others.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that some people have forgotten how important character or virtue ethics are. Your example of the article about the Ohio football players is a good example of journalists using virtue ethics in not releasing the names of anyone involved, but something else to me stood out about the article. At the top, there was a video of a news report about the trial. In the video, the defendants were clearly in the screen, and I was shocked that their faces were not blurred out. I think this is an example of journalists using poor virtue ethics. Yes, they kept their names out of the report, but putting their faces on national TV could be just as much of an invasion of privacy as releasing their names. I'm sure the parents of the boys would be very upset when they saw that FOX News decided to not pixelate their faces. This makes me wonder why a news organization would choose to keep identities anonymous in some ways and not others, and if ethics of virtue or character change based on the medium news is being presented through.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rachel did a great job of outlining the true meaning of virtue ethics. Her choice of ethics was an interesting one and one that many forget about in the real world. I liked how Rachel introduced each rule with the origin and where it was derived from, and then she would give a very straightforward example of how a journalist used the rule. This made it very simple and easy for the reader of her blog to understand what she was informing us about. In Rachel’s concluding paragraph, she makes a very interesting point about greedy journalist, nowadays, doing whatever it takes to get the most jaw-dropping or controversial story they can get out there. When I thought of this point, I immediately thought about some of the racy or shocking stories about certain celebrities or political figures. Most of the time, this information isn’t that necessary for others to know or hear about because it’s invasion of that individual’s privacy, but readers find some kind of joy or entertainment from this information. This is just one of the many ways journalists and people don’t follow virtue ethics. Bullying on social media is another example of how people forget about virtue ethics, today. Rachel’s conclusion paragraph did an excellent job of making her readers continue to think about some ethical issues that remain in journalism, as well as in social media.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Virtue ethics is definitely becoming a major problem with the technology that exists today. Most people have never heard of such principles like the Golden Rule or Golden Mean. The example of the trial in Ohio is a perfect example of the Golden Rule however journalists abandoned the rule once the trial started. The boys, recently found guilty, are public figures that must carry their mistakes with them through life. Also, your example of the Golden Mean is just one of many instances where the media skews reports. Oftentimes, I read an article and the author includes their opinion which strongly influences the reader. I believe the way to solve these issues is to educate the public on such concepts. If people realize the effect that their actions could have, they will think twice before they do something. In journalism, we see people cross the line very often, but if they were educated on virtue ethics they would hesitate before continuing with their actions.

    ReplyDelete